<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ari Takes Pictures &#187; depth of field</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aribrownest.com/tag/depth-of-field/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aribrownest.com</link>
	<description>Photography and Ranting - I dish it out, you eat it up.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:57:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Two Photography Birds, One Domestic Cat Stone</title>
		<link>http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/lucky-depth-of-field/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/lucky-depth-of-field/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 02:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kap0w</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depth of field]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lucky]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aribrownest.com/?p=2124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you might have noticed, I love my 50mm lens &#8211; the Nifty Fifty.  Photography would be a much more accessible and enjoyable hobby if more good stuff cost less.  Honestly, at this point, I raise an eyebrow much faster at a lens that costs less than $100 than I do at one that costs [...]<p><a href="http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/lucky-depth-of-field/">Two Photography Birds, One Domestic Cat Stone</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.aribrownest.com">Ari Takes Pictures</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you might have noticed, <a href="http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/diy-bokeh-or-making-stars/">I love</a> <a href="http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/taking-pictures-of-food/">my 50mm</a> <a href="http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/the-man-in-charge/">lens</a> &#8211; the <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/12142-USA/Canon_2514A002_Normal_EF_50mm_f_1_8.html" target="_blank">Nifty Fifty</a>.  Photography would be a much more accessible and enjoyable hobby if more good stuff cost less.  Honestly, at this point, I raise an eyebrow much faster at a lens that costs less than $100 than I do at one that costs more than $1,000.  But I&#8217;m getting off the subject &#8211; where was I.  Ah yes.  The Nifty Fifty.  This is a great lens that anyone who owns a Canon (D)SLR should have.  The main selling point after the price is that huge f/1.8 aperture.  That makes it a good two stops faster than most &#8220;good&#8221; lenses and worlds better than the slow end of what comes bundled with your average camera.  This has some obvious upsides (<a href="http://www.aribrownest.com/tag/bokeh/">bokeh</a>, anyone?) but there are also some problems.</p>
<p>It is easy to take bad pictures with this lens.  Out of focus pictures.  Here&#8217;s the key.  In most situations, the camera is going to drop the lens all the way open in order to gain more light.  Unless you set the aperture yourself, this means shallow <a href="http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/depth-of-field/">depth of field</a>.  When you take a picture of two people maybe 8 feet away with one slightly in front of the other, someone is going to be blurry.  You see where I&#8217;m going here?  No?  Well that&#8217;s why I brought examples.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.aribrownest.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/lucky-DOF-head-focus.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-2125" title="Lucky The Cat, with focus on his head" src="http://www.aribrownest.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/lucky-DOF-head-focus-380x570.jpg" alt="Lucky The Cat, with focus on his head" width="380" height="570" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">This, my friend, is <a href="http://www.aribrownest.com/tag/lucky/">Lucky the Cat</a>, doing what he does (when he isn&#8217;t rapaciously eating or rapaciously scratching people).  Without moving the camera, but with a twist of the focus ring, you get this:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.aribrownest.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/lucky-DOF-paw-focus.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-2126" title="Lucky the cat, with focus on his paw" src="http://www.aribrownest.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/lucky-DOF-paw-focus-380x570.jpg" alt="Lucky the cat, with focus on his paw" width="380" height="570" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Lucky is a big cat, but he&#8217;s not that big.  This is <em>shallow</em> depth of field.  You can do some great stuff with it, but you&#8217;ve got to remember that it exists.  If you want more DOF, you have to dial your aperture down a few stops, which means you need a higher ISO speed or a longer exposure length.  This is the same with any lens, of course.  The only difference is with the Nifty Fifty, you have the <em>option</em> of going down to 1.8.  You&#8217;ll never have the shallow DOF problem with an f/5.6 lens because you&#8217;ll have your own, completely different problems instead.  I&#8217;ll take this one any day.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/lucky-depth-of-field/">Two Photography Birds, One Domestic Cat Stone</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.aribrownest.com">Ari Takes Pictures</a></p>
 <img src="http://www.aribrownest.com/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=2124" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" /><fb:like href='http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/lucky-depth-of-field/' send='false' layout='standard' show_faces='true' width='450' height='65' action='like' colorscheme='light' font='lucida+grande'></fb:like><span class="fb_share"><fb:like href="http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/lucky-depth-of-field/" layout="box_count"></fb:like></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/lucky-depth-of-field/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Storm of Pink?</title>
		<link>http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/pink-tulips-skagit-valley/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/pink-tulips-skagit-valley/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 05:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kap0w</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depth of field]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flowers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skagitvalley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tulips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aribrownest.com/?p=1854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you see the fields of tulips, looking out over all the different colors is pretty nice, but some of my favorite pictures were down close with just one color.  Pink works pretty well. Camera&#160;&#038;&#160;Lens &#160; Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XT (Canon) &#038; 100.0 mm &#160;&#160;&#160; Shutter: &#160; 1/400&#160;s Creation Date: &#160; 2009:04:25 09:41:38 &#160;&#160;&#160; [...]<p><a href="http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/pink-tulips-skagit-valley/">A Storm of Pink?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.aribrownest.com">Ari Takes Pictures</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you see the fields of tulips, looking out over all the different colors is pretty nice, but some of my favorite pictures were down close with just one color.  Pink works pretty well.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.aribrownest.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/tulip-field-pink.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1853 aligncenter" title="Pink Tulip Field in Skagit County 2009" src="http://www.aribrownest.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/tulip-field-pink-380x570.jpg" alt="Pink Tulip Field in Skagit County 2009" width="380" height="570" /></a></p>
<div align="center">
<table width="400" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" class="exif">
<tr valign="middle">
<td class="header">Camera&nbsp;&&nbsp;Lens</td>
<td class="content_dark">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_dark">Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XT (Canon) &#038; 100.0 mm</td>
<td width="25">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td>
<td class="header">Shutter:</td>
<td class="content_bright">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_bright">1/400&nbsp;s</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="middle">
<td class="header">Creation Date:</td>
<td class="content_dark">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_bright">2009:04:25 09:41:38</td>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td>
<td class="header">Aperture:</td>
<td class="content_bright">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_bright">f/5.6</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="middle">
<td class="header">Artist:</td>
<td class="content_bright">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_dark">Ari Brown</td>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td>
<td class="header">ISO:</td>
<td class="content_bright">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_bright">200</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="middle">
<td class="header_last">Exposure&nbsp;Mode:</td>
<td class="content_dark_last">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_dark_last">Normal program</td>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td>
<td class="header_last">Focal&nbsp;Length:</td>
<td class="content_bright_last">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_bright_last">100&nbsp;mm</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<p><!-- END ExZo v0.b7.2 --></p>
<p>This one comes from my 100 mm macro lens.  I love the shallow depth of field, which devolves into solid pink.  On the Digital Rebel XT I shoot with, you&#8217;ve got to multiply the focal length by 1.6, so I have a 160mm lens which means I was probably 5 feet back from the flower in question.  With overcast sun shooting at ISO 200, you still have plenty of light to freeze any movement in the breeze, but late in the day or inside, this isn&#8217;t the perfect lens for hand-held shooting.  Sometimes it&#8217;s nice to try to figure out what else you can do with the lenses you have.  Macros are great up close, but that&#8217;s not all they can do.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/pink-tulips-skagit-valley/">A Storm of Pink?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.aribrownest.com">Ari Takes Pictures</a></p>
 <img src="http://www.aribrownest.com/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=1854" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" /><fb:like href='http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/pink-tulips-skagit-valley/' send='false' layout='standard' show_faces='true' width='450' height='65' action='like' colorscheme='light' font='lucida+grande'></fb:like><span class="fb_share"><fb:like href="http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/pink-tulips-skagit-valley/" layout="box_count"></fb:like></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/pink-tulips-skagit-valley/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Depth Of Field &#8211; Instruction-o-rama!</title>
		<link>http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/depth-of-field/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/depth-of-field/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 22:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kap0w</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[africanviolet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depth of field]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flowers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aribrownest.com/?p=1692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ll just say this up front &#8211; for a lot of people, this is really elementary stuff.  Every photo class I&#8217;ve ever taken, for the first or second assignment, did something with DoF (depth of field).  In any case, I was playing around and just happened to end up with some pictures that demonstrate it [...]<p><a href="http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/depth-of-field/">Depth Of Field &#8211; Instruction-o-rama!</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.aribrownest.com">Ari Takes Pictures</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll just say this up front &#8211; for a lot of people, this is really elementary stuff.  Every photo class I&#8217;ve ever taken, for the first or second assignment, did something with DoF (depth of field).  In any case, I was playing around and just <em>happened</em> to end up with some pictures that demonstrate it well, so I&#8217;m posting here.  Someone said they liked this stuff before.  We&#8217;ll see what you think.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.aribrownest.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/african-violet-28.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1693" title="African Violet taken at f/2.8" src="http://www.aribrownest.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/african-violet-28-570x380.jpg" alt="African Violet taken at f/2.8" width="570" height="380" /></a>Wanna learn all about it, or just see some purdy pictures?  Click the link:</p>
<p><span id="more-1692"></span>
<div align="center">
<table width="400" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" class="exif">
<tr valign="middle">
<td class="header">Camera&nbsp;&&nbsp;Lens</td>
<td class="content_dark">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_dark">Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XT (Canon) &#038; 100.0 mm</td>
<td width="25">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td>
<td class="header">Shutter:</td>
<td class="content_bright">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_bright">1/25&nbsp;s</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="middle">
<td class="header">Creation Date:</td>
<td class="content_dark">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_bright">2009:03:08 10:58:01</td>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td>
<td class="header">Aperture:</td>
<td class="content_bright">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_bright">f/2.8</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="middle">
<td class="header">Artist:</td>
<td class="content_bright">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_dark">Ari Brown</td>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td>
<td class="header">ISO:</td>
<td class="content_bright">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_bright">100</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="middle">
<td class="header_last">Exposure&nbsp;Mode:</td>
<td class="content_dark_last">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_dark_last">Normal program</td>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td>
<td class="header_last">Focal&nbsp;Length:</td>
<td class="content_bright_last">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_bright_last">100&nbsp;mm</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<p><!-- END ExZo v0.b7.2 --></p>
<p>Gonna get really elementary on you for a second.  <a href="http://www.aribrownest.com/tag/depthoffield/">Depth of Field</a> is controlled by your <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aperture" target="_blank">aperture</a>.  The aperture is a hole that lets light reach your sensor or film.  A big number means a tiny hole.  A small number means a big hole.  Lenses that are referred to as &#8220;fast&#8221; are lenses that are capable of really opening up the aperture wide, to let a lot of light in fast, which allows the &#8220;fast&#8221; capture of a picture, even in low light.  My <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/194451-USA/Canon_4657A006_100mm_f_2_8_USM_Macro.html" target="_blank">100mm macro lens</a>, which I took these pictures with, has an aperture (or f-stop) that goes up to f/2.8.  Not bad.</p>
<p>Alright &#8211; got that out of the way.  Here comes the DoF.  The larger the aperture, the deeper the Depth of Field.  Sometimes that is good.  If you&#8217;re taking a picture of a few rows of people, you probably want them all in focus, right?  Well I&#8217;m not taking pictures of lots of people &#8211; I&#8217;m taking pictures of a flower today.  Isn&#8217;t it purdy?  It&#8217;s the one African Violet that somehow I&#8217;ve never killed and my cats have never succeeded in eating.  Furry leaves don&#8217;t go down so easy.  Enough of that &#8211; picture stuff.  Shallow DoF is useful more often than you&#8217;d think.  If you take a look at that picture above, there is a nice flower, right?  What there isn&#8217;t is much in the background.  That&#8217;s because I used a really wide aperture (2.8) which blurs most everything else out.  It doesn&#8217;t even keep the entire flower in focus, but I like the look, so good.   Let&#8217;s try it with a smaller aperture:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.aribrownest.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/african-violet-56.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1694" title="African Violet, taken with 5.6 Aperture" src="http://www.aribrownest.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/african-violet-56-570x380.jpg" alt="African Violet, taken with 5.6 Aperture" width="570" height="380" /></a>
<div align="center">
<table width="400" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" class="exif">
<tr valign="middle">
<td class="header">Camera&nbsp;&&nbsp;Lens</td>
<td class="content_dark">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_dark">Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XT (Canon) &#038; 100.0 mm</td>
<td width="25">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td>
<td class="header">Shutter:</td>
<td class="content_bright">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_bright">1/5&nbsp;s</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="middle">
<td class="header">Creation Date:</td>
<td class="content_dark">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_bright">2009:03:08 10:58:27</td>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td>
<td class="header">Aperture:</td>
<td class="content_bright">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_bright">f/5.6</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="middle">
<td class="header">Artist:</td>
<td class="content_bright">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_dark">Ari Brown</td>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td>
<td class="header">ISO:</td>
<td class="content_bright">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_bright">100</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="middle">
<td class="header_last">Exposure&nbsp;Mode:</td>
<td class="content_dark_last">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_dark_last">Aperture priority</td>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td>
<td class="header_last">Focal&nbsp;Length:</td>
<td class="content_bright_last">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_bright_last">100&nbsp;mm</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<p><!-- END ExZo v0.b7.2 --></p>
<p>Here we are at 5.6.  That&#8217;s 6 clicks down on this lens from 2.8 and gives us a little more DoF, as you can see.  The flower is a bit more in-focus and the background is much clearer.  This smaller aperture also means that you have a slower shutter speed to account for less light coming in.  Keeping this lens still is pretty hard when you&#8217;re up close like this, so I&#8217;m using a monopod.  It helps a bit.  Six stops didn&#8217;t make that big of a difference, right?  Let&#8217;s go all craz and crank the aperture WAY down:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.aribrownest.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/african-violet-32.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1695" title="African Violet with an aperture of f/32" src="http://www.aribrownest.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/african-violet-32-570x380.jpg" alt="African Violet with an aperture of f/32" width="570" height="380" /></a>
<div align="center">
<table width="400" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" class="exif">
<tr valign="middle">
<td class="header">Camera&nbsp;&&nbsp;Lens</td>
<td class="content_dark">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_dark">Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XT (Canon) &#038; 100.0 mm</td>
<td width="25">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td>
<td class="header">Shutter:</td>
<td class="content_bright">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_bright">8&nbsp;s</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="middle">
<td class="header">Creation Date:</td>
<td class="content_dark">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_bright">2009:03:08 10:58:44</td>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td>
<td class="header">Aperture:</td>
<td class="content_bright">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_bright">f/32.0</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="middle">
<td class="header">Artist:</td>
<td class="content_bright">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_dark">Ari Brown</td>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td>
<td class="header">ISO:</td>
<td class="content_bright">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_bright">100</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="middle">
<td class="header_last">Exposure&nbsp;Mode:</td>
<td class="content_dark_last">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_dark_last">Aperture priority</td>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td>
<td class="header_last">Focal&nbsp;Length:</td>
<td class="content_bright_last">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="content_bright_last">100&nbsp;mm</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<p><!-- END ExZo v0.b7.2 --></p>
<p>This is with an aperture of 32.  That&#8217;s a LOT smaller than 5.6.  15 clicks.  What is going on with the picture?  Well obviously I was too lazy to get the tripod out and instead of 1/25th of a second (for the first picture) or 1/5th second (second picture), the exposure time here is 8 seconds.  But it doesn&#8217;t matter right?  Because the point wasn&#8217;t to frame this and put it on your wall &#8211; it was to look at the DoF.  Clearly the camera is shaking a bit, but otherwise, the flower is entirely in focus.  Look behind it.  See that red candy bowl?  That&#8217;s in focus too.  Do you want to see the candy bowl?   Well f/32 might be the aperture for you.  If you were maybe more into looking at the flower, f/2.8 might be better.  The point is, you can control this stuff.  Not all lenses can go as low as f/2.8, but f/5.6 is very common, even on a pretty cheap lens, and that same lens can most likely do f/32 as well.  In order to control for DoF like this, you&#8217;ll want to set your camera to Av  or Aperture Priority mode.  Some cameras even have a nifty DoF mode, but that&#8217;s between you and your hardware.   In Av mode, you can select the aperture setting you like and the camera will pick the correct shutter speed to go with it.  This is probably the second most common mode I use on my camera.  Ooh&#8230; one last comment &#8211; DoF at any setting is deeper the further away you are from the lens.  My flower above may be less than an inch deep, but since it was very close to the camera, it&#8217;s still not totally in focus close up.  If I shot it sitting a few feet back at the same setting, it would all be in focus.  Just something to think about.</p>
<p>Got any good DoF pictures of your own?  Link to &#8216;em below.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/depth-of-field/">Depth Of Field &#8211; Instruction-o-rama!</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.aribrownest.com">Ari Takes Pictures</a></p>
 <img src="http://www.aribrownest.com/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=1692" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" /><fb:like href='http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/depth-of-field/' send='false' layout='standard' show_faces='true' width='450' height='65' action='like' colorscheme='light' font='lucida+grande'></fb:like><span class="fb_share"><fb:like href="http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/depth-of-field/" layout="box_count"></fb:like></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/depth-of-field/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ari the human lightmeter</title>
		<link>http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/rolleicord-trees-in-bw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/rolleicord-trees-in-bw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kap0w</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B&W]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depth of field]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rolleicord]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aribrownest.com/2009/01/rolleicord-trees-in-bw/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I finally got the film back from my first attempt at actually shooting with the Rolleicord. I have no lightmeter and neither does the Rollei, so you have to use the magic guidelines stamped onto the back of the camera and your imagination.  I was somewhat shocked that the pictures came back in any [...]<p><a href="http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/rolleicord-trees-in-bw/">Ari the human lightmeter</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.aribrownest.com">Ari Takes Pictures</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.aribrownest.com/wp-content/main/2009_01/rolleicord-bw-tree-neopan.jpg"><img class="photoQcontent photoQLinkImg aligncenter" src="http://www.aribrownest.com/wp-content/thumbnail/2009_01/rolleicord-bw-tree-neopan.jpg" alt="Ari the human lightmeter" width="580" height="572" /></a></p>
<div class="photoQDescr">So I finally got the film back from my first attempt at actually shooting with <a href="http://www.aribrownest.com/2008/12/rolleicord/">the Rolleicord</a>.  I have no lightmeter and neither does the Rollei, so you have to use <a href="http://www.aribrownest.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/rollei-exposure-guide.jpg">the magic guidelines</a> stamped onto the back of the camera and your imagination.  I was somewhat shocked that the pictures came back in any sort of serviceable condition, but I&#8217;ll take it.  I shot one roll of Neopan 400 and since this is 120 film, it only has 12 shots per roll.  Here&#8217;s the first &#8211; I think maybe there are one or two more worth showing off.  I didn&#8217;t write it down as I&#8217;m a spoiled digital photographer but I believe the exposure here is something like f/5.6 at 1/100th of a second.  I didn&#8217;t realize how shallow it would come out looking, but combined with the sparse tree limbs and the great angles you can get with Twin Lens Reflex cameras, I like this one a lot.</div>
<ul class="photoQExifInfo">
<li class="photoQExifInfoItem"> <span class="photoQExifTag">DateTimeOriginal:</span> <span class="photoQExifValue"> </span></li>
<li class="photoQExifInfoItem"> <span class="photoQExifTag">Model:</span> <span class="photoQExifValue">QSS-32_33</span></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/rolleicord-trees-in-bw/">Ari the human lightmeter</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.aribrownest.com">Ari Takes Pictures</a></p>
 <img src="http://www.aribrownest.com/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=615" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" /><fb:like href='http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/rolleicord-trees-in-bw/' send='false' layout='standard' show_faces='true' width='450' height='65' action='like' colorscheme='light' font='lucida+grande'></fb:like><span class="fb_share"><fb:like href="http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/rolleicord-trees-in-bw/" layout="box_count"></fb:like></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aribrownest.com/photos/rolleicord-trees-in-bw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

